Legal Opinion

Shatto v. McLeod Regional Medical Center

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 11, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2009-130166; No. 5239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

WILLIAMS, J.

This case comes before this court on remand after our supreme court’s decision in Shatto v. McLeod Regional Medi*597cal Center, 406 S.C. 470, 753 S.E.2d 416 (2013), with instructions to address whether Mildred Shatto’s fall while in the operating room at McLeod Regional Hospital (McLeod) was idiopathic in nature. After a review of the record, we affirm the order of the Appellate Panel of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (the Appellate Panel) and find Shatto suffered a compensable, work-related injury.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts surrounding…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Douglas v. Spartan Mills, Startex DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Bagwell v. Ernest Burwell, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Charter 1 RealtySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  2. Barnes v. Charter 1 RealtySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  3. Foran v. Murphy United States, Emp'r, & Liberty Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API