Legal Opinion
Gabler v. Holder and Smith, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 1, 2000No. 94,308PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAROL M. HANSEN, Vice-Chief Judge:
T1 Appellants, Darrell Gabler and Kath-ern Gabler (Gablers), who are husband and wife, initiated this action after they were involuntarily discharged from employment by Appellee, Holder & Smith (H & S8). Darrell Gabler began working for H & S in 1988. When he was discharged on May 29, 1999, he was vice-president of H & S, and owned five percent of its common stock. Kathern Ga-bler, who was also discharged on May 29, 1999, began working for H & S in 1996 and was manager of its graphics department.
T2 H & S is an Oklahoma corporation operating in Tulsa as…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Eddy v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Darrow v. Integris Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Miner v. Mid-America Door Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Thornton v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- Crain v. National American Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.