Legal Opinion

Moore v. Allied Aviation Fueling Co. of Minnesota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 1986No. C7-85-1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

A referee of the Department of Economic Security denied relators' application for unemployment compensation benefits on the grounds that their unemployment was due to their participation in a strike against their employer, respondent Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Minnesota, Inc. Rela-tors appealed to the representative of the Commissioner of Economic Security, who affirmed the referee’s determination. This court granted certiorari to review relators’ claim that they are entitled to unemployment benefits because their unemployment was a result of a lockout. We affirm.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. UhlendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Scott v. Photo Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Danielson Mobil, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API