Legal Opinion

Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 9, 1996No. 15240PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.

This appeal raises the issue of whether the doctrine of res judicata bars a party to a dissolution action from bringing a postdissolution action against a former spouse for damages incurred as a result of conduct that had occurred during the marriage. We conclude that, in this context, the policy considerations commonly advanced to justify the doctrine of res judi*584cata are not compelling and that the application of that doctrine to bar the subsequent action would fail to achieve the doctrine’s objectives.1

The following undisputed facts are pertinent to this appeal. In 1988, the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Xiao Yang Chen v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API