Board of Commissioners v. Deitsch
Ohio Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Appeals of Mercer county. A petition in due form was filed with the county commissioners of Mercer county, praying for the location, deepening, straightening and tiling of a ditch upon the route therein described.
Read the full summary
Error to the Court of Appeals of Mercer county. A petition in due form was filed with the county commissioners of Mercer county, praying for the location, deepening, straightening and tiling of a ditch upon the route therein described. Upon hearing and actual view, in all respects in accordance with the requirements of law, the county commissioners found that the improvement sought was necessary, would be conducive to the public health, convenience and welfare and a benefit to the lots and lands’along the line thereof, and, further, that the route described was the best route; and ordered…
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The defendants in error, by a cross-petition in error filed herein, question the validity of the action of the court of appeals altering the date of its journal entry, claiming that the court’s action in that regard was without jurisdiction, and complain that but for such alteration of the entry the record would disclose that this court has not acquired jurisdiction of the case.
The rule has been so frequently stated and so universally recognized that judgments are under the control of the court which pronounces them, during the term at which they are rendered, that nothing further than a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stevens v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Shaffer v. RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Young v. Featherstone Motors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954
- State v. GrisafulliOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Porter, Exr. v. LerchOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Prendergast v. GinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.