Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Excello-Textron Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1989No. CA88-07-097PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, P.J.

On January 27, 1986, plaintiff-appellee, Stuart Rockne Coleman, was injured while operating a grinding machine manufactured by defendant-appellant, Excello-Textron Corporation. Excello is now the successor corporation of Micro-Matic Hone Corporation, which originally manufactured and sold the Model 844-1 flat lap machine to Coleman’s employer, Ford Motor Company in Sharonville, Ohio, on June 4, 1956.

The flat lap machine is used for the purpose of grinding to a specified flatness or tolerance various transmission parts. The machine consists of a horizontal grinding wheel which rotates in a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mastellone v. Lightning Rod Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Sapp v. Stoney Ridge Truck TireOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Byrley v. Nationwide Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Phillips v. City of Garfield HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. White Hat Management, L.L.C. v. Ohio Farmers InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API