Legal Opinion

Dorn v. Village of North Olmsted

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1938No. 26668PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

What new legal relationship, if any, was created between the defendant, Morris, and Wilkinson by reason of the latter getting into the defendant’s automobile for the purpose of pointing out to the defendant where a certain man by the name of Shindler lived. Plaintiff, as the administrator of the estate of Wilkinson, contends that Wilkinson was a passenger for compensation while the defendant contends that he was a guest within the meaning of Section 6308-6, General Code, generally referred to as the Guest Statute of Ohio.

The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Knutson Ex Rel. Knutson v. LurieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Lyttle v. MontoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Hunter v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Russell v. ParleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Kruzie v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Rothman v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Scholz v. LeuerWashington Supreme Court · 1941

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API