United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
It is contended here that the United States as a shipper is barred from challenging in federal courts an Interstate Commerce Commission order which denies the Government a recovery in damages for exaction of an allegedly unlawful railroad rate. Other contentions if sustained would deny federal courts all power to entertain an action by any shipper challenging a Commission order denying damages to the shipper.
During the war, existing tariffs of many railroads embodied wharfagé- charges to compensate the railroads for moving goods from railroad cars to piers and from piers to railroad cars.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by237 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Union Pacific Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.