Legal Opinion

United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 20, 1949No. 330PublishedCited by 237 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

It is contended here that the United States as a shipper is barred from challenging in federal courts an Interstate Commerce Commission order which denies the Government a recovery in damages for exaction of an allegedly unlawful railroad rate. Other contentions if sustained would deny federal courts all power to entertain an action by any shipper challenging a Commission order denying damages to the shipper.

During the war, existing tariffs of many railroads embodied wharfagé- charges to compensate the railroads for moving goods from railroad cars to piers and from piers to railroad cars.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by237 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API