Legal Opinion
Phillips v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 3, 1941No. 201PublishedCited by 452 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
As part of a flood control and hydro-electric development, the Grand River Dam Authority, an agency of the State of Oklahoma, was empowered to construct the Grand River Dam, with authority to borrow money and accept grants from the United States. Oklahoma Laws of 1935, Art. 4, c. 70. For the construction of the dam the United States allotted twenty million dollars to the Authority. Eight and one-half millions, in round numbers, were to be used as a grant, and eleven and one-hálf for the bonds of the Authority. Construction began in February, 1938, and by the spring of last year much of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ex Parte BransfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ex Parte Public National Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by452 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
447 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.