City of Winona v. School-District, No. 82
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Winona county, to recover possession of a school-house and site. The action was submitted, upon stipulated facts, before Start, J., without a jury, and judgment ordered for defendant. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The defendant, a duly-organized public school-district, acquired and held for school purposes a school-house and site. In February, 1887, an act was passed entitled “An act to amend the charter of the city of Winona,” (Sp. Laws 1887, c. 5,) which extended the limits of the city so as to include a part of the defendant district, embracing the school-house in question. This act contained no express provision changing the limits of the school-district, and none as to the disposition of this school property. The question now is to which — plaintiff or defendant — does the school-house belong?
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Inhabitants of Hampshire v. Inhabitants of FranklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
- Inhabitants of Windham v. Inhabitants of PortlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Town of Milwaukee v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Willis v. MabonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Winters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State ex rel. Olsen v. Board of Control of State InstitutionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Pass Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty. v. Hollywood City Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.