Legal Opinion

Moore v. Rogers

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1958No. Civ. 5728PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

On May 14, 1953, the parties to this action entered into an agreement providing that it was agreed by the plaintiff Moore that the total labor and costs of framing the houses then under construction on certain lots in Santa Ana would be $500 each; that all materials used on said jobs were to be ordered and paid for by Rogers; and that “For use of Moore’s contracting license on the city building permits for houses on the above numbered lots, and for his help and supervision on the jobs, Moore agrees to accept 25% of the profits,” the profits to be the net above all costs of the land and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Jordan v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Douillard v. WooddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. ZimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Skrbina v. Fleming Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Fries v. BeadlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Cohn v. BugasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Carpenter International, Inc. v. Kaiser Jamaica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  5. Braly v. Midvalley Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API