Legal Opinion

Fries v. Beadles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1963No. Civ. 26939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

This is an appeal from a portion of a decree of final distribution. The appellant contends that the superior court committed error in determining that the will of decedent, Maude Fries, while embodying the nomination of an executor, made no disposition of any of the decedent’s property.1 The appellant is Walter Fries, the surviving husband *727of the decedent and the person named as executor. The respondents are the decedent’s surviving brother and sister, George Beadles and Ellen Connolly, and Ruth Midgley, the surviving daughter of a deceased sister. The superior court determined that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Schubert v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kurlan v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Mallarino v. HammersmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Kurkjian v. OhannesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Radin v. Jewish National FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Wells Fargo Bank v. HuseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Kime v. BarnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Estate of WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API