Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Zimmer

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1948No. Civ. No. 16150PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

In March, 1941, while working as a switch-man in the Union Pacific Railroad yards at Cheyenne, Wyoming, respondent Lawrence Zimmer sustained a fractured left elbow under circumstances concededly giving rise to a cause of action in his favor against his employer, Union Pacific Railroad Company, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, (35 Stats. 65 et seq., 45 U.S.C.A. §§51-60). On the second day after the accident, respondent’s arm was operated on by Dr. Fox, a surgeon in the employ of the railroad, and was placed in a cast. About May 6, Dr. Fox removed the cast, and told respondent, “Your…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Graham v. Atchison. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Pacific Electric Railway Co. v. DeweyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Valentine v. Plum Healthcare Grp., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande WR Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API