City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNOW, Judge.
¶ 1 The Arizona Department of Transportation (“ADOT”) appeals the summary judgment requiring it to reimburse the City of Chandler for the relocation of utility lines necessitated by the construction of a state highway. Because the trial court erred in interpreting Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 28-7156 (2004) to mandate such reimbursement, we vacate the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Chandler owns several water and sewer utility lines that had to be moved to construct the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2007
- HCZ Construction Inc. v. First Franklin Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Members of the Board of Education of the Pearce Union High School District v. LeslieArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Schlecht v. SchielArizona Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Democratic Party of Pima County v. Beth Ford Pima County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Alejandro v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Curtis v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State of Arizona v. James A. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.