Legal Opinion

City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 18, 2007No. 1 CA-CV 05-0631PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SNOW, Judge.

¶ 1 The Arizona Department of Transportation (“ADOT”) appeals the summary judgment requiring it to reimburse the City of Chandler for the relocation of utility lines necessitated by the construction of a state highway. Because the trial court erred in interpreting Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 28-7156 (2004) to mandate such reimbursement, we vacate the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Chandler owns several water and sewer utility lines that had to be moved to construct the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. HCZ Construction Inc. v. First Franklin Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Members of the Board of Education of the Pearce Union High School District v. LeslieArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Schlecht v. SchielArizona Supreme Court · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Democratic Party of Pima County v. Beth Ford Pima County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Alejandro v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Curtis v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. State of Arizona v. James A. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API