Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 2, 2019No. 1 CA-CV 18-0587-FCUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE In re the Matter of: KAREN CURTIS, Petitioner/Appellee, v. NATHAN THOMAS, Respondent/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 18-0587 FC FILED 7-2-2019 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. FC2016-071340 The Honorable Lisa Ann VandenBerg, Judge VACATED AND REMANDED COUNSEL Adam C. Rieth, PLLC, Mesa By Adam C. Rieth Counsel for Petitioner/Appellee Thomas Law Office PLC, Phoenix By Ronald…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Romero v. Southwest AmbulanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. Bobrow v. BobrowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  4. Walter v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Canty v. CantyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API