Legal Opinion
Democratic Party of Pima County v. Beth Ford Pima County Board of Supervisors
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 27, 2012No. 2 CA-CV 2011-0070PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 The Democratic Party of Pima County (the Democratic Party) appeals from the superior court’s order denying its request for attorney fees and costs in a special action arising from its public-records request submitted to Beth Ford, in her capacity as Pima County Treasurer (the Treasurer), and the Pima County Board of Supervisors (the Board of Supervisors). The Democratic Party asserts that it “substantially prevailed” in obtaining the records, and it therefore was entitled to an award of attorney fees and costs pursuant to A.R.S. § 39-121.02. For the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony SocietyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Pima County by City of Tucson v. Maya Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, SinesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Anthony Garcia v. Hon. butler/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Hannosh v. SegalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Paradigm DKD Grp., LLC v. Pima Cnty. AssessorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.