Legal Opinion

Schlecht v. Schiel

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1953No. 5677PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Plaintiff s-appellees Frank Schiel and Virdie Schiel, husband and wife, filed an action seeking damages and an injunction, alleging defendants-appellants Arthur Schlecht and Alice Schlecht, husband and wife, diverted the natural stream flow of Powder House Wash, in the vicinity of Wickenburg, Arizona, into plaintiffs’ property (a tourist court) to1 their great damage. After trial to a jury, judgment for plaintiffs on the verdict of $6650 was entered; injunctive relief was denied, as was the motion for new trial, and defendants then perfected this appeal.

The trial of the case,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProebstelArizona Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa IncArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. GodsoeArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Kennecott Copper Corporation v. McDowellArizona Supreme Court · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API