Legal Opinion
Black v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 2008No. S-12639PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
An owner of a condominium unit in a community consisting of single-family homes on large parcels of land appealed the Municipality of Anchorage's assessment of property taxes. The owner claims that the Municipality erred by assessing taxes against the land under and around his stand-alone condominium unit and by inaccurately assessing the home's value. The owner's appeal to the Board of Equalization was unsuccessful, and the superior court affirmed the Board and awarded the Municipality attorney's fees. The owner appeals the Board's decision and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Lauth v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Pruitt v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Rosen v. State Board of Public AccountancyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Lindhag v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Horan v. Kenai Peninsula Borough Board of EqualizationAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Varilek v. BurkeAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Norman Randle v. Bay Watch Condominium AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Silver Bow Construction v. State, Department of Administration, Division of General ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- City of Nome Equalization Board v. Norton Sound Health CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2026