Legal Opinion

Town of Chouteau v. Blankenship

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1944No. 31447PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is a suit by the owners of property in block 1 in the incorporated town of Chouteau to enjoin the town and its officers from opening Ohio street and from molesting the plaintiffs in the use of said street in connection with the use of their properties. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs as prayed, and the defendants appealed.

The trial court made findings of fact, which are responsive to the issues made by the pleadings, the material portion of which is as follows:

“After having heard the evidence adduced on behalf of all parties and being fully and sufficiently…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foot v. Town of WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. State Ex Rel. King v. McCurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Langston City v. GustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Salyer v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Reinhart & Donovan Co. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Boise City v. SinselIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. City of Billings v. Pierce Packing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Purvis v. BuseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Dade County v. City of North Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API