Legal Opinion

Benham v. Ham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1892No. 691PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Superior Qou/rt, SpoTcane County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

The first question that presents itself in this case is, is it necessary to reduce a claim to judgment, issue an execution, and secure a return of nulla bona made thereon, to support a creditor’s bill? Or is an attachment lien a sufficient basis for such an action? Many cases have been cited both by appellant and respondents on this proposition, and from an investigation of the cases it must be conceded that the weight of opinion, considering both the old cases and the new, sustains the doctrine that the claimant must press his claim to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berger v. . VarrelmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Ephraim v. KelleherWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Root v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Warren v. His CreditorsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Burnham v. HaskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank v. GreenhoodMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Wilson v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. In Re Cascade Fixture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Keyes v. SabinWashington Supreme Court · 1918

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API