Legal Opinion

Ephraim v. Kelleher

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1892No. 291PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

*244The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J. —

From August, 1889, until March 13, 1890, appellant and W. T. Eelleher were partners doing business as retail dry goods merchants in the city of Seattle, in this state, under the firm name and style of W. T. Eelleher & Co. On February 28,1890, the firm, being indebted, settled with their creditors by paying half of their indebtedness in cash, and giving their firm notes for the balance to Schweitzer & Go., of San Francisco, who represented all of their creditors. There were four of these notes, each for the sum of $3,133.80, and amounting…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Etheridge v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Robinson v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Morris v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Means v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. People ex rel. Farrington v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Boice v. Finance & Guaranty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Benham v. HamWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Keyes v. SabinWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Miller v. ScarbroughWashington Supreme Court · 1919

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API