Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Harris

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1898PublishedCited by 34 opinions

On rehearing. Statement of the facts by the justice delivering the opinion. Creditors’ bill to • avoid an assignment for the benefit of creditors made by Bathsheba Harris to Moses Morris. Bathsheba Harris on December 14, 1891, made a general assignment for the benefit of her creditors, with preferences declared in favor of certain creditors, among whom were her daughter, Annie Harris, and her daughter-in-law, Sarah S. Harris, wife of Ben E. Harris.

Read the full summary

On rehearing. Statement of the facts by the justice delivering the opinion. Creditors’ bill to • avoid an assignment for the benefit of creditors made by Bathsheba Harris to Moses Morris. Bathsheba Harris on December 14, 1891, made a general assignment for the benefit of her creditors, with preferences declared in favor of certain creditors, among whom were her daughter, Annie Harris, and her daughter-in-law, Sarah S. Harris, wife of Ben E. Harris. From September, 1884, to October, 1891, the assignor conducted a clothing business, through the agency and management of her son, Ben E. Harris,…

1Opinion of the CourtPigoix, J.

Defendants specify 93 errors of law, and 34 particulars in which the evidence is claimed to be insufficient to justify the findings. Many of the questions presented are difficult of solution, and have received from us the painstaking examination and attentive consideration which their importance demands.

1. The first error assigned is the action of the court in overruling defendants’ objection to the introduction of any evidence. It is contended that the complaint is fatally defect*385ive because it omits to charge the insolvency of Bathsheba Harris, and her lack of property other than that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. City of Denver v. BayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Jones v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Shultz v. . HoaglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ellinghouse v. Ajax Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Raymond v. BlancgrassMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bullard v. ZimmermanMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Wheeler & Motter Merc. Co. v. MoonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Hustad v. ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1958

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API