Legal Opinion

Root v. Potter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1886PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Clinton. (Smith, J.) Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

This proceeding in equity was brought by several creditors of the firm of Potter, Beattie & Co., composed of John A. Potter, Adam Beattie, and Evan M. Potter, formerly doing several kinds of business, chiefly in Ovid, but also in Hasty and Ashley station, in Gratiot connty. On the seventeenth of July, 1884, this firm made a general assignment, in favor of creditors, to Charles M. Hagadorn. This bill is filed, in furtherance of the assignment, to subject to its operation a considerable amount of assets, in personalty, realty, and claims discharged, of certain securities executed to John Sowers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tyler v. PeattMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Maynard v. HoskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Griswold v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Benham v. HamWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Charles Root & Co. v. HarlMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Sheldon v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Voorhees v. CarpenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API