Legal Opinion

Lukas v. Tarpilauskas

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 14, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The defendant is the mother of Stanley Brazauskas whom, it could be found, the plaintiff had agreed to marry. The declaration alleged that the defendant, “wickedly and maliciously intending to injure and defame the plaintiff, wrongfully induced her son” to break the contract of marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant’s son. In the Superior Court the verdict was for the plaintiff.

The plaintiff testified that she was to marry Stanley Brazauskas on October 12, 1925; that in June of that year they *499were riding in an automobile; that they stopped on the way and "she fainted and while she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harriott v. PlimptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Multer v. KnibbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Homan v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Leonard v. WhetstoneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Ableman v. HolmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Caverno v. FellowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Herbits v. Constitution Indemnity Co. of PhiladelphiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Nelson Ex Rel. Nelson v. MelvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Conway v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Zanzonico v. ZanzonicoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API