Herbits v. Constitution Indemnity Co. of Philadelphia
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.
The four plaintiffs, who are attorneys at law, have sued the defendant in an action of tort. They aver in their declaration that the defendant “wilfully and maliciously and with intent to deprive the plaintiffs of the benefits, advantages and profits” of a contract of employment with a client to undertake and prosecute to a trial or settlement her action of tort for personal injuries, “did influence, persuade and induce” the client to settle her action for an inadequate amount, whereby the plaintiffs lost the benefits, advantages and profits of the contract and the value of the services…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berry v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Sibley v. NasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Anderson v. MoskovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Wheeler-Stenzel Co. v. American Window Glass Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Moore Drop Forging Co. v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Owen v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Cavicchi v. KoskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Klauder v. CregarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Buckley v. JohnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.