Legal Opinion
Conway v. O'Brien
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 30, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCbosby, J.
This is an action of tort to recover damages. The amended declaration alleges that the plaintiff had "entered into a contract with one Michael Carroll, whereby they mutually agreed to marry each other, that the defendant, well knowing of the existence of the said agreement between the said plaintiff and the said Michael Carroll, maliciously and without probable cause, procured, influenced and obtained the said Michael Carroll to breach the said agreement, and through the procurement by the defendant, the said Michael Carroll did breach the agreement and refused to perform the same, wherefore…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Folsom v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Jones v. . StanlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sawyer v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Ross v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Herbits v. Constitution Indemnity Co. of PhiladelphiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Attridge v. PembrokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- MacDonald v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.