Ableman v. Holman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberRY, J.
The appealing defendants contend, first, that two persons cannot conspire to bring about a breach by one of them of a contract to which that one is a party; second, that no action lies against a third party for inducing a breach of a contract of marriage.
If the second proposition is sound it disposes of this appeal, because the trial was so involved with the alleged conspiracy and the evidence relevant to the issue so different because of the allegations of conspiracy that a new trial must be had if the theory upon which the case was tried cannot be sustained.
In response to the special…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Martens v. ReillyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- White v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Homan v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nelson Ex Rel. Nelson v. MelvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Conway v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Ryther v. LeffertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Lukas v. TarpilauskasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Brown v. GlicksteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.