Legal Opinion
Mann v. Castiel
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 3, 2010No. Civil Action 09-2137 (RCL)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a joint motion to dismiss by defendants David and Cameran Castiel and Gerald Helman. These defendants assert that plaintiffs failed to comply with the Court’s order of March 9, 2010, which required plaintiffs to file proof of service of process or show cause for their failure to effect timely service pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Upon consideration of the Court’s order [8], the plaintiffs’ response [9], these defendants’ motion [10], the applicable law, and the record…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Treasury Employees Union v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- John Mann v. David CastielCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Williams v. GEICO CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Garlington v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Battle v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Judd v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.