Legal Opinion

National Treasury Employees Union v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 13, 1996No. 96-5217PublishedCited by 364 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

Opinion concurring in Part II B filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

The National Treasury Employees Union (“NTEU” or “Union”), its president, and two of its members appeal from the dismissal of their suit challenging the constitutionality of the Line Item Veto Act, Pub.L. No. 104-130, 100 Stat. 1200 (codified at 2 U.S.C. §§ 691-692 (1996)), for lack of Article III standing. We affirm, holding that appellants’ alleged injury is neither sufficiently concrete nor imminent to create a justiciable controversy.

I. Background

This…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by364 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters v. Brian NewbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  3. Wyoming Outdoor Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  4. National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Awad v. ZiriaxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

359 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API