Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 10, 1941No. 14,881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Otto Bock

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, in which the district court set aside an award of the Industrial Commission in favor of Harry Noble, plaintiff in error, to whom we hereinafter refer as claimant, and entered judgment in favor of The Rocky Mountain Fuel Company, defendant in error, hereinafter designated as employer. Claimant is here on writ of error to review this judgment.

The referee’s findings, adopted by the commission, are as follows:

“The question presented is whether or not this injury arose out of and in the course of claimant’s employment. Claimant had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Terlecki v. StraussSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  3. Industrial Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  4. In re AyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Tennessee Chemical Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Massey v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Divelbiss v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONSSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Hayes v. Alabama By-Products CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Stockham Pipe Fittings Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Industrial Commission v. Hayden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API