Legal Opinion
In re Ayers
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1918No. 10,086PublishedCited by 25 opinions
From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Certified question of law. Proceedings under the -Workmen’s Compensation Act in the matter of one Omer Ayers. Certified question of law by the Industrial Board.
1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.
— The Industrial Board of the State of Indiana has certified to this court a statement of facts and propounded a question of law thereon, for decision and determination by the court, as follows:
“Statement of Facts: On and prior to the 23rd day of November, 1916, Omer Ayers was in the employment of the Ansted Spring and Axle Company as a shearer at an average weekly wage of $15.95; that on and prior to the 23rd day of Noveifl.ber, 1916, a custom existed in the defendant’s factory and among its employes whereby the employes quit their actual work about fifteen minutes before going off actual…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Holland-St. Louis Sugar Co. v. ShralukaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lasear, Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Holt Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Jeffries v. Pitman-Moore Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- The Studebaker Corp. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.