Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Alabama By-Products Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1942No. 6 Div. 906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

This action arises under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Alabama.

The decree of the circuit court denying appellant compensation for the death of her son Talford Hayes was entered June 30, 1941. The case comes here on writ of certiorari.

The question before this court is whether an accident arises out of and in the course of employment when it occurs after the employee has quit work for the day and has left the premises where his services are rendered and while he is in the process of taking a shower at a boarding ¡house leased and operated by a third 'person who permits ■ the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Barnett v. Britling Cafeteria Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Jett v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Shickley v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Massey v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Blair v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Malbis Bakery Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Gilmore v. Rust Engineering CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Grider v. McKenzieCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API