Phiropoulos v. Bi-State Development Agency
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SIMON, Judge.
Susan Phiropoulos (Phiropoulos) appeals from a judgment against her in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of Bi-*713State Development Agency (Bi-State). Phi-ropoulos contends that the trial court abused its discretion by permitting the jury to view a videotape reenactment prepared by Bi-State. We reverse and remand.
On review the trial court is granted great deference in ruling on the admissibility of a videotape. Nash v. Stanley Magic Door, Inc., 863 S.W.2d 677, 681[7] (Mo.App.E.D. 1993). That ruling will not be disturbed unless the trial court abused its discretion.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richardson v. State Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- McPherson Redevelopment Corp. v. WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Nash v. Stanley Magic Door, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte Joshua Dewayne Ragston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- State v. MinnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Grose v. Nissan North America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. PowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. McNearMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.