Legal Opinion

Phiropoulos v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1995No. 67151PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Judge.

Susan Phiropoulos (Phiropoulos) appeals from a judgment against her in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of Bi-*713State Development Agency (Bi-State). Phi-ropoulos contends that the trial court abused its discretion by permitting the jury to view a videotape reenactment prepared by Bi-State. We reverse and remand.

On review the trial court is granted great deference in ruling on the admissibility of a videotape. Nash v. Stanley Magic Door, Inc., 863 S.W.2d 677, 681[7] (Mo.App.E.D. 1993). That ruling will not be disturbed unless the trial court abused its discretion.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. State Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. McPherson Redevelopment Corp. v. WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Nash v. Stanley Magic Door, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Joshua Dewayne Ragston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  2. State v. MinnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. Grose v. Nissan North America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. PowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. McNearMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API