Legal Opinion

Nash v. Stanley Magic Door, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1993No. 61758PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

Plaintiff, Opal Nash, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant, Stanley Magic Door, Inc., in a personal injury action. We affirm.

Stanley Magic manufactures automatic doors which operate on a system of electronics and pneumatics. Generally, these doors are activated by pressing a push plate which provides an electric current that opens an air line and thereby supplies air to a pnuematic cylinder, causing the cylinder to move and open the doors. A timer in the system, which can be adjusted, causes the doors to automatically close after…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Bean v. RiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Gassen v. WoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Eagleburger v. Emerson Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Luthy v. Denny's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Daniel v. Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Bray v. Bi-State Development Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Grose v. Nissan North America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Phiropoulos v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Savant v. Lincoln EngineeringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API