Nash v. Stanley Magic Door, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.
Plaintiff, Opal Nash, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant, Stanley Magic Door, Inc., in a personal injury action. We affirm.
Stanley Magic manufactures automatic doors which operate on a system of electronics and pneumatics. Generally, these doors are activated by pressing a push plate which provides an electric current that opens an air line and thereby supplies air to a pnuematic cylinder, causing the cylinder to move and open the doors. A timer in the system, which can be adjusted, causes the doors to automatically close after…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pierce v. Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Bean v. RiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Gassen v. WoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Eagleburger v. Emerson Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Luthy v. Denny's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daniel v. Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bray v. Bi-State Development Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Grose v. Nissan North America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Phiropoulos v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Savant v. Lincoln EngineeringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.