Legal Opinion

State v. McNear

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2011No. SD 30229PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.

Michael McNear (“Defendant”) appeals his convictions for assault and armed criminal action. We need not relate the facts in order to address his claim that State’s Exhibit 23, a store surveillance video of the incident (“video”), was improperly admitted into evidence.

Although Defendant now alleges several deficiencies in the video’s evidentiary foundation, he raised only one of these at trial, and did not preserve it in his motion for new trial, which raised a different objection not asserted at trial. Other objections now asserted were not raised at trial or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MinnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. State v. DalyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. ZelingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Phiropoulos v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. PowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Darnell BrownleeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. MoyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI v. PAVEL SAMSINAKMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DEPARIS D. TOWNSEND, Defendant-AppellantMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API