Legal Opinion

State v. Minner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 30, 2008No. SC 88986PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*94RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

Edwin Minner appeals his conviction for violating section 195.218, RSMo Supp.2003, which prohibits the delivery of a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of “public housing or other governmental assisted housing.” The State failed to prove that Min-ner knew he was within one thousand feet of public housing when he delivered a controlled substance. The judgment is reversed. The case is remanded for an entry of conviction for the class B felony of delivery of a controlled substance under section 195.211.1

FACTS

On August 16, 2004, officers Hensley and Rataj of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Hensley v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. State v. HattonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Marvin D. RiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. State v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State of Missouri v. Tony Ray KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State of Missouri v. John M. RamirezMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. McLaughlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API