Legal Opinion

Arment v. Kmart Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 31, 1995No. 34272-0-IPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

On November 25, 1989, Sharon Arment and her husband Brian were shopping in the Kmart store on Delridge Way S.W. in Seattle. While walking through the menswear department, Ms. Arment slipped on some liquid on the floor between two clothes racks. The liquid was some type of clear soda. According to her husband, a Kmart cup was lying next to the spill. Arment sued Kmart for negligence, relying on the "mode of operation” rule. She alleged that the soda came from the in-store cafeteria Kmart operates at the Delridge store and that Kmart’s operation of the cafeteria created a reasonably foreseeable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pimentel v. Roundup CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Ciminski v. Finn Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Ingersoll v. DeBartolo, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wiltse v. Albertson's Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ethridge v. HwangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Perkins Coie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Ethridge v. HwangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API