Legal Opinion

Round Hill General Improvement District v. Newman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1981No. 12449PublishedCited by 326 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Zenoff, Sr. J. 1 :

Petitioner Round Hill General Improvement District (Round Hill), and intervening petitioner Incline Village General Improvement District (IVGID), seek writs of mandamus to compel the State Engineer to act on their applications for permits to appropriate water from Lake Tahoe. NRS 533.325 et seq. The State Engineer has declined to act on the applications on the ground that a pending court action in the area is not final.

NRS 533.370(3) provides:

The state engineer shall either approve or reject each application within 1 year from the final date for filing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. List v. County of DouglasNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Buchanan v. BuchananNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  3. United States v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. City of Henderson v. Henderson Auto Wrecking, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Sheriff, Clark County v. ProvenzaNevada Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by326 opinions

  1. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Miller v. BurkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Cote v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008

321 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API