Legal Opinion

Miller v. Burk

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2008No. 51768, 51798PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Gibbons, C. J.:

Petitioners challenge real parties in interest’s candidacies for state offices or positions on local governing bodies based on the Nevada Constitution’s Article 15, Section 3(2) term-limit amendment. That amendment, which became effective in late November 1996, provides that a person may not serve more than 12 years in any state office or as a member of any local governing body. The primary question presented here is whether that amendment applies to an individual who was elected to a term of office before the amendment’s effective date but commenced serving…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Jeremias v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Landreth v. MalikNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Armenta-Carpio v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Strickland v. WaymireNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API