Cote v. Eighth Judicial District Court
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In resolving this petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus, we consider whether NRS 201.230(1), which defines the offense of *38lewdness with a minor under the age of 14, can be used to adjudicate as delinquent a minor under the age of 14. We conclude that because NRS 201.230’s plain, broad language applies to “persons” of all ages, the statute can be used to adjudicate as delinquent minors under the age of 14, even though they are part of the class of persons protected by the statute.1 Accordingly, we are not persuaded that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pan v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Smith v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by92 opinions
- Halcrow, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Sandpointe Apartments, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Clark County Department of Family Services v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- CANARELLI v. DIST. CT. (CANARELLI)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.