Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hennessy v. Huston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1903No. 4664PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

Original application is made in this court for a writ of mandate directed to the superior court of Pierce county and to the Honorable Thad Huston, one of the judges thereof. The petition recites, substantially: That on or about the 16th day of January, 1902, the petitioners commenced an action in said court, in which the Tacoma Smelting & Refining Company, a corporation, and others, were defendants; that at the time of filing their complaint in said action they applied to the respondent, one of the judges of said court, for a temporary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pacific Supply Co. v. BrandWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Poock v. Lafayette Building Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Belles v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jones v. BabcockWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hennessy v. Tacoma Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  4. Briscol v. American Southern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Baasch v. Cooks Union, Local No. 33Washington Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API