Legal Opinion

Belles v. Carroll

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1893No. 821PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Cowrt, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

*132The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

-Appellants by this appeal seek to reverse a judgment alleged to have been irregularly entered against them as upon their default. The record shows that no motion was made in the court below to set aside the judgment, and such being the case this court will not enter into an investigation of the merits of the question as to whether or not such judgment was in fact irregularly entered; as, in our opinion, the appellants should have sought a remedy against such judgment by motion or otherwise in the court below before coming here. As we refuse to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Belles v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Hennessy v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. C. S. Barlow & Sons v. H. & B. Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Walton v. HartmanWashington Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API