Pacific Supply Co. v. Brand
Washington Supreme Court
Apx>eal from Superior Court, Pierce County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.
The appellant filed its complaint in the superior court of Pierce county, to which the respondents interposed a demurrer, which was sustained by the court, and appellant was granted ten days to amend. After the lapse of said time, no further proceedings having been had, the respondents moved said court for an order adjudging appellant to be in default, and for a dismissal of the action, *358whereupon the court entered an order accordingly, and dismissed the action. This motion was not resisted, nor was any motion made to set said judgment aside.…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Van Horne v. WatrousWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- State ex rel. Hennessy v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Tulloch v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Hall v. SkavdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Woodward v. McConnaugheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.