Gordon v. Hillman
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered March 18, 1918, in favor of the plaintiff, in garnishment proceedings, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
The plaintiffs, having a judgment against the defendants Hillman and wife, caused a writ of garnishment to he issued directed to the Pacific Excursion Company. This writ was served upon *530one E. S. Bateman. The company made a special appearance and moved to quash the writ on the ground that it had not been served upon a properly qualified representative of the company. In support of this motion, it produced the affidavit of Bateman, who swore that he was neither the president, vice president, secretary, general manager nor managing agent of the Pacific Excursion Company, and not a person…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Hennessy v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Belles v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Main v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by18 opinions
- Alex Novack & Sons v. HoppinNevada Supreme Court · 1961
- Coleman v. Moore & McIntoshNevada Supreme Court · 1925
- Wolford v. WolfordNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Koboski v. CobbWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Johnson v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.