Legal Opinion
United States v. Olson
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided April 2, 2015No. 14-0166/AFPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred by denying Appellant’s motion to suppress the fruits of a law enforcement search of her residence. We hold that the military judge’s finding that Appellant voluntarily consented to the search was not clearly erroneous, and he did not abuse his discretion in admitting the seized evidence.
I. Posture of the Case
A special court-martial composed of officer members convicted Appellant, contrary to her pleas, of violating a lawful general regulation by possessing drug paraphernalia;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WicksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. JasperCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. EriksonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. LeonhardtUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. ArnoldUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- United States v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.