Legal Opinion
United States v. Erikson
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 9, 2017No. 16-0705/ARPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge OHLSON
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of two specifications of sexual assault and one specification of adultery in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10- U.S.C. §§ 920, 934 (2012). The specifications were merged for sentencing purposes and Appellant was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three years, and .reduction in grade to E-l. The convening authority disapproved and dismissed one specification of sexual…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. McElhaneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. EllerbrockCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. LeonhardtUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. WeiserU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. ArnoldUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- United States v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020
- United States v. BraimerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.