Legal Opinion

United States v. Wallace

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided February 13, 2008No. 07-0194/AFPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted Appellant’s petition to determine whether the military judge erred when he denied a defense motion to suppress the results of a search of Appellant’s computer. We hold that the military judge correctly denied the motion and affirm the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals.

I

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification each of carnal knowledge, sodomy with a child, and possessing child pornography, in violation of Articles…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. WicksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  2. United States v. HoffmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  3. United States v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  4. United States v. DeaseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  5. United States v. PirenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API