Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. DeMaio

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 17, 2004No. Misc. AG No. 10, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, by Bar Counsel filed, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751 1 of the Maryland Rules of Procedure, a Petition For Disciplinary Or Remedial Action, against Louis J. DeMaio, the respondent, in which it was charged that the respondent violated Rules 1.1, Competence, 2 3.1, Meritorious Claims and Contentions, 3 3.3, Candor Toward the Tribunal, 4 8.1, Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters, 5 and 8.4, Misconduct, 6 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, as adopted by Maryland Rule 16-812. Bar Counsel also alleged that the respondent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Rheb v. Bar Ass'n of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AlisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. In Re Paul G. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re De MaioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GubermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API