Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Frost
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 26, 2014No. 69ag/12PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner” or “Bar Counsel”), acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a), filed a “Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action” against James Albert Frost (“Respondent” or “Frost”), on December 5, 2012. Petitioner charged Frost with violating various Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MLRPC” or “Rule”), specifically Rule 8.1 (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters),1 Rule 8.2(a) (Judicial and Legal Officials);2 and Rule 8.4(a), (c) and (d) (Misconduct).3
Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-752(a) (Order Designating Judge), this Court…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Slade Healthcare, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BasingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.