Legal Opinion
Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 11, 1987No. 2077, 2078, 2086, 2087 CA A36033 (control), A36034, A36035, A36036PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Petitioners seek judicial review of four orders of the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission approving proposed annexations to the City of Portland of approximately 450 acres of contiguous land east of the present city boundary. The annexations were initiated by the city under ORS 199.490(2), 1 the so-called “triple majority” rule, pursuant to which the city received the written consent to annex their land in writing from more than half of the land owners in the territory proposed to be annexed, who also owned more than half of the land in the territory representing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Hill v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Olsen v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Kaltsas v. City of North ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.